Current:Home > MarketsCalifornia Legislature likely to ask voters to borrow $20 billion for climate, schools -AdvancementTrade
California Legislature likely to ask voters to borrow $20 billion for climate, schools
View
Date:2025-04-18 10:16:57
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Mired in a stream of multi-billion dollar budget deficits, the California Legislature on Wednesday will likely turn to voters for help.
Lawmakers are set to vote on whether to place a pair of $10 billion bonds on the November ballot. If approved by voters, the money would pay for the building of new schools and help communities prepare for the impacts of climate change.
California was swimming in money just a few years ago as budget surpluses totaled well over $100 billion through the pandemic. But the state had to slash spending to cover deficits totaling more than $78 billion over the past two years as revenues declined amid rising inflation and an economic slowdown in the state’s pivotal technology industry.
Money from the bonds would backfill some of those cuts, plus pay for a slew of priority projects up and down the state for years to come.
But the money isn’t free. The climate bond alone will cost taxpayers more than $19 billion to pay off, with annual payments of $650 million per year, putting more pressure on the state’s finances.
Asking voters for permission to borrow large sums of money is always risky, particularly when doing it multiple times in the same election.
In addition to the two statewide ballots, voters will likely be asked to approve hundreds of local borrowing proposals — including a massive $20 billion housing bond for the nine counties that surround the San Francisco Bay.
Recent history suggests voters are tiring of these bonds.
In 2020, despite a history of approving statewide school bonds, voters rejected a $15 billion education borrowing proposal — what would have been the largest in state history. And earlier this year, voters only narrowly approved Proposition 1 authorizing the state to borrow more than $6 billion to help house the homeless — a result widely seen as a warning for lawmakers who were considering taking on more debt.
“I would have thought that the razor-thin margin on Proposition 1 would be a wake-up call on these ill-defined bonds,” said Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. “Whether it comes to education homelessness or climate, California citizens perceive that they are not getting value for their dollar.”
Supporters say voters are savvy enough to recognize the great need that will be filled — most school facilities are built with a combination of state and local money. But demand for state dollars is so great that there’s a waiting list of projects worth more than $3 billion, according to Democratic Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, who sits on the committee that approves the funding.
Much of the climate bond would go to improve water supply and help prepare for wildfires. Statewide, nearly 400 water systems don’t meet state safety standards. Meanwhile, 15 of the 20 most destructive wildfires in state history have occurred in the past decade. Heat waves are getting longer and more severe, placing public safety at risk, and intense winter storms have caused damaging floods in recent years.
“It’s something that’s more tangible for people here and more real because they’ve seen it so much,” said Melissa Romero, deputy legislative director for California Environmental Voters, an advocacy group that supports the bond.
Negotiations over the education bond have been ongoing for nearly two years, and the final result did not please everyone. Money from the bond would only apply to public schools and community colleges, excluding the University of California and the California State University systems.
Plus, some advocacy groups say the bond would benefit wealthier school districts at the expense of poorer districts — something they say has been a persistent problem with the state’s program of funding school facility construction.
“It would continue the status quo, with some nominal equity adjustments that really won’t address the underlying issue,” said Nicole Gon Ochi, deputy managing attorney for Public Advocates, a nonprofit law firm and advocacy group.
Muratsuchi said the bond would make it easier for districts to qualify for the state’s financial hardship program and would help districts with fewer resources navigate the complex process of applying for state grants.
Concerns about the climate bond center on whether $10 billion is enough to make a difference, especially given how the money would be divided up.
“I fear that the money in this bond has been so split up into so many different directions that we’re not going to see the results we need to see,” she said.
Democratic Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia noted that “difficult decisions needed to be made” given the competing priorities for limited funding.
“We also had to consider the dynamics of what voters and members of this House would support,” he said.
veryGood! (659)
Related
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- How randomized trials and the town of Busia, Kenya changed economics
- CBO says debt ceiling deal would cut deficits by $1.5 trillion over the next decade
- Unions are relieved as the Supreme Court leaves the right to strike intact
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- In Florida, DeSantis May End the Battle Over Rooftop Solar With a Pen Stroke
- Cuando tu vecino es un pozo de petróleo
- Mega Millions jackpot grows to $820 million. See winning numbers for July 21.
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Russia’s War in Ukraine Reveals a Risk for the EV Future: Price Shocks in Precious Metals
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Just Two Development Companies Drive One of California’s Most Controversial Climate Programs: Manure Digesters
- In a Strange Twist, Missing Teen Rudy Farias Was Home With His Mom Amid 8-Year Search
- Facebook, Instagram to block news stories in California if bill passes
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker
- Jessica Simpson Seemingly Shades Ex Nick Lachey While Weighing in On Newlyweds' TikTok Resurgence
- Save 57% On Sunday Riley Beauty Products and Get Glowing Skin
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Victor Wembanyama's Security Guard Will Not Face Charges After Britney Spears Incident
John Mayer Cryptically Shared “Please Be Kind” Message Ahead of Taylor Swift Speak Now Release
Save 57% On Sunday Riley Beauty Products and Get Glowing Skin
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Eva Mendes Shares Rare Insight Into Her and Ryan Gosling's Kids' “Summer of Boredom”
Nearly 200 Countries Approve a Biodiversity Accord Enshrining Human Rights and the ‘Rights of Nature’
Can ChatGPT write a podcast episode? Can AI take our jobs?