Current:Home > reviewsNew rule strengthening federal job protections could counter Trump promises to remake the government -AdvancementTrade
New rule strengthening federal job protections could counter Trump promises to remake the government
View
Date:2025-04-24 13:49:40
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government’s chief human resources agency issued a new rule on Thursday making it harder to fire thousands of federal employees, hoping to head off former President Donald Trump ‘s promises to radically remake the workforce along ideological lines if he wins back the White House in November.
The Office of Personnel Management regulations will bar career civil servants from being reclassified as political appointees, or as other at-will workers, who are more easily dismissed from their jobs. It comes in response to “Schedule F,” an executive order Trump issued in 2020 that sought to allow for reclassifying tens of thousands of the 2.2 million federal employees and thus reduce their job security protections.
President Joe Biden nullified Schedule F upon taking office. But if Trump were to revive it during a second administration, he could dramatically increase the around 4,000 federal employees who are considered political appointees and typically change with each new president.
How many employees might have been affected by Schedule F is unclear. However, the National Treasury Employee Union used freedom of information requests to obtain documents suggesting that federal workers such as office managers and specialists in human resources and cybersecurity might have been subject to reclassification — meaning that the scope of Trump’s order might have been broader than previously believed.
The new rule could counter a future Schedule F order by spelling out procedural requirements for reclassifying federal employees, and clarifying that civil service protections accrued by employees can’t be taken away regardless of job type. It also makes clear that policymaking classifications apply to noncareer, political appointments and can’t be applied to career civil servants.
“It will now be much harder for any president to arbitrarily remove the nonpartisan professionals who staff our federal agencies just to make room for hand-picked partisan loyalists,” National Treasury Employees Union President Doreen Greenwald said in a statement.
Good government groups and liberal think tanks and activists have cheered the rule. They viewed cementing federal worker protections as a top priority given that replacing existing government employees with new, more conservative alternatives is a key piece of the conservative Heritage Foundation’s nearly 1,000-page playbook known as “ Project 2025.”
That plan calls for vetting and potentially firing scores of federal workers and recruiting conservative replacements to wipe out what leading Republicans have long decried as the “deep state” governmental bureaucracy.
Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which has led a coalition of nearly 30 advocacy organizations supporting the rule, called it “extraordinarily strong” and said it can effectively counter the “highly resourced, anti-democratic groups” behind Project 2025.
“This is not a wonky issue, even though it may be billed that way at times,” Perryman said. “This is really foundational to how we can ensure that the government delivers for people and, for us, that’s what a democracy is about.”
The final rule, which runs to 237 pages, is being published in the federal registry and set to formally take effect next month. The Office of Personnel Management first proposed the changes last November, then reviewed and responded to 4,000-plus public comments on them. Officials at some top conservative organizations were among those opposing the new rule, but around two-thirds of the comments were supportive.
If Trump wins another term, his administration could direct the Office of Personnel Management to draft new rules. But the process takes months and requires detailed explanation on why new regulations would be improvements — potentially allowing for legal challenges to be brought by opponents.
Rob Shriver, deputy director of the Office of Personnel Management, said the new rule ensures that federal employee protections “cannot be erased by a technical, HR process” which he said “Schedule F sought to do.”
“This rule is about making sure the American public can continue to count on federal workers to apply their skills and expertise in carrying out their jobs, no matter their personal political beliefs,” Shriver said on a call with reporters.
He noted that 85% of federal workers are based outside the Washington area and are “our friends, neighbors and family members,” who are “dedicated to serving the American people, not political agendas.”
veryGood! (49236)
Related
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Pakistan says its planned deportation of 1.7 million Afghan migrants will be ‘phased and orderly’
- North Korea provides Russia artillery for the Ukraine war as U.S. hands Kyiv ammunition seized from Iran
- German prosecutors say witness evidence so far doesn’t suggest a far-right leader was assaulted
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Georgia’s governor continues rollback of state gas and diesel taxes for another month
- Kentucky had an outside-the-box idea to fix child care worker shortages. It's working
- Philippines protests after a Chinese coast guard ship nearly collides with a Philippine vessel
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Simone Biles' good-luck charm: Decade-old gift adds sweet serendipity to gymnastics worlds
Ranking
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Savannah Bananas announce 2024 Banana Ball World Tour schedule, cruise
- Fire sweeps through a 6-story residential building in Mumbai, killing 6 and injuring dozens
- Prosecutor won’t seek charges against troopers in killing of ‘Cop City’ activist near Atlanta
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- What's plaguing Paris and why are Catholics gathering in Rome? Find out in the quiz
- A Florida man who shot down a law enforcement drone faces 10 years in prison
- German prosecutors say witness evidence so far doesn’t suggest a far-right leader was assaulted
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Boy thrown from ride at Virginia state fair hospitalized in latest amusement park accident
Police officers won't face charges in fatal shooting of protester at 'Cop City'
NGO rescue ship saves 258 migrants off Libya in two operations
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
This 50% Off Deal Is the Perfect Time to Buy That Ninja Foodi Flip Air Fry Oven You've Wanted
Suspect arrested in attempted abduction of University of Virginia student
Mongolia, the land of Genghis Khan, goes modern with breakdancing, esports and 3x3 basketball